Public opinion on Shays’s rebellion was mixed. Some prominent Massachusetts residents supported it; others, including famed patriot Samuel Adams, thought that the rebels should be executed. Even though the Massachusetts legislature initially banned Shays’s rebels from serving on juries and holding public office, many of them were pardoned later that year by the new governor, John Hancock. In addition, the newly elected state legislature addressed the farmers’ initial demands by cutting taxes and postponing debt repayment. Shays was pardoned as well and eventually moved to New York.
Despite the fact that Shays’s Rebellion resulted in some success for the protesters, the fact that the national government had not been able to remedy the financial situation that sparked the rebellion or provide an adequate military response to suppress the uprising caused many Americans to question the Articles of Confederation. How could Americans expect to protect themselves from hostile foreign countries if the national government could not put down a local rebellion waged by farmers? How could the government address its financial problems if it could not raise taxes? Shays’s Rebellion highlighted the fundamental weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation and gave rise to the debate that eventually led to an entirely new constitution.
The LOOKING GLASS for
1787
Pay Commutation
Drive them to it
I abhor the antifederal Faction
Comply with Congress
Gentlemen this Machine is deep in the mire and you are divided as to its releaf--
Tax Luxury
the People are oprest
curses on to Foederal Govermt.
Success to Shays
Curse Independence
Council of Twelve
[on wagon] CONNECTICUT
[on scroll] American Antiquities
Parnassus
I despise your Copper
CATO
Cur's commutation
J.
Takes all to pay taxes
I fear & dread the Ides of MAY
Agricola
A good Shot
S H P
New York
From Connecticut to New York paying £40000 per annum Impost
Tweedles Studdy
as I sit plodding by my taper
A House divided against its self cannot stand Mat. Chap 12th verse 26